Posts

From Direct Action to Terrorism: Palestine Action and the Constitutional Rebalancing of Protest and Executive Power.

Image
COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS HIGH COURT RULING AGAINST UK GOVERNMET BAN. Palestine Action and the Expanding Boundaries of UK Counter-Terrorism Law: A Shift from Protest to Procription. (By Israel Ojekeh Parper Snr. 15 June 2026)   Appeal Court : C.J. Rt. Hon. Baroness Carr ABSTRACT: In this article I will discuss:  (A)   CORE CONCEPTUAL TRIANGLE INCLUDING : (1) Terrorism Law:  Broad definition, including  property damage. (2)   Human Rights : breach of ECHR  Articles 10 & 11 and  Proportionality and  ( 3) Executive Power: Discretion and   National security.  The case is an intersection of all three issues.  B. CRITICAL THEMES TO BE  UNDERSTOOD: (1) “ Protest vs Terrorism”:  Blurring of categories and l egal vs political classification. (2) “Chilling Effect”:  Deterrence of lawful conduct and  its a cceptance by the Court of Appeal ( 3) “Judicial Deference ”:  Courts step back whilst...

THE UNTOLD STORY OF THE CLOSURE OF THE SIERRA LEONE RAILWAYS

Image
THE UNFORESEEN AND UNFORTUNATE DEMISE OF THE SIERRA LEONE RAILWAYS THROUGH NEGLET, GREED AND SELFISHNESS! (SLR: 1898 to 1975) Narrative by Solomon Pratt - 2012 @ age 92 https://youtu.be/7ZHQB8YAKj4?si=PbdbC-B6gH36u21r Clink Link- Solomon Pratt - SLR - in his own words SAJ PRATT -Ex GM - SLR    Xx FOOTNOTE:

THE STATE Vs ZAINAB SHERIFF: A POSTSCRIPT!

Image
The Selective Sword of “Incitement”: Selective Justice and the Soul of a Democracy. The sentencing of popular entertainer and activist Zainab Sheriff on 14 April 2026 to over four years in prison has ignited a fierce debate regarding the limits of political speech in Sierra Leone.  While the state frames the verdict as a victory for public order, the case revives a critical legal question: when does the duty to prevent disorder become a tool for systematic political suppression? The Legal Ghost: Lessons from Common Law Sierra Leone’s Public Order Act 1965  remains rooted in a broad, colonial-era interpretation of "incitement" that English Law has since largely abandoned. To secure a conviction, the state must prove three core elements: an actus reus (an act capable of persuading another to commit a crime), a mens rea (the specific intent for that crime to occur), and communication of that message THERE IS NO DENAL T...

THE STATE Vs ZAINAB SHERIFF: THE DAY OF JUDGEMENT

Image
From Common Law to Cultural Icons: The Selective Sword of “Incitement” The sentencing of Zainab Sheriff on  14 April 2026  to four years and two months in prison has ignited a fierce debate on the limits of political speech. To understand the gravity of this case, one must first understand what the state is legally required to prove to secure a conviction for incitement. The Elements of Incitement Under the traditional legal framework still active in Sierra Leone, the prosecution must prove three core elements beyond a reasonable doubt: The Actus Reus:  That the defendant performed an act (speech, writing, or gesture) capable of encouraging or persuading another to commit a crime. The Mens Rea:  That the defendant had the specific intent that the crime be committed. Communication:  That the message reached its intended audience, even if no crime was ultimately carried out. The Ghost of English Law and the "World at Large" The prosecution in the Sheri...

THE STATE Vs ZAINAB SHERIFF: JUDGEMENT By Israel Ojekeh PARPER Snr

Image
From Common Law to Cultural Icons: The Selective Sword of “Incitement” ZAINAB SHERIFF:JAILED 4 YEAR 2 MONTHS The sentencing of Zainab Sheriff on 14 April 2026 to four years and two months in prison has ignited a fierce debate on the limits of political speech. To understand the gravity of this case, one must first understand what the state is legally required to prove to secure a conviction for incitement. The Elements of Incitement Under the traditional legal framework still active in Sierra Leone, the prosecution must prove three core elements beyond a reasonable doubt: The Actus Reus: That the defendant performed an act (speech, writing, or gesture) capable of encouraging or persuading another to commit a crime. The Mens Rea: That the defendant had the specific intent that the crime be committed. Communication: That the message reached its intended audience, even if no crime was ultimately carried out. The Ghost of English Law and the "World at Large " The p...