OUR INDEPENDENCE WAS FOR: FREEDOM EQUALITY & JUSTICE
SIERRA LEONE INDEPENDENCE BILL DID NOT PROVIDE FOR MOLESTATION OF OUR LEADERS
Our Independence in 1961 was for Freedom, Unity (Equality) and Juctice for all. Today we face a situation where Ex Soldiers can without any fear of the Law, BEAT UP the Country's Defence Minister - a sign of TOTAL disrespect for Law and Order and of Authority.
I produce here below, Hansard records of the days when the British Parliament discussed our readiness for Independence and the aftermath of our capabilities to handle things ourselves. 51 years on, we face this brutality and violence tolally unacceptable in a civilised environment. We successfully negotiated the 2007 General elections and we survived the eminent violence - thanks to a mindful and sensible Chairman of the Electorial Commission Dr Christiana Thorpe (or we could have gone the way of the Ivory Coast). We are about to enter fully into the dawn of the next General and Presidential elections in November, and here now at end July/ begining August, we see the Defence Minister being beaten up- clothes thorn in full photographic display. This is a disgrage to the Nation!! The question is were we ready for the Freedom, Unity (Equality) and Justice which we pride ouselves (wrap) ourselves so thightly with the colours of our Flag- the Three-colours- Green, Whit and Blue?
It is an awful shame that even in Today's Political Sierra Leone, we still face this babarick tune of lawlessness. The direction from which this emanates is all to often plain to see. This sort of babaric attitude were well documented in the 1960s and early 1970/80s. Think of Pujehun, "N'Dobogosu ", or the Mana Kpaka experience: are we going to see this sort of political non - briliant approcch to the coming elections that are just round the corner?
TAKE a look at the Brithsh discussion below prior to finalising our Independence Status, and think whether our DEMOCRACy is really POLITICAl CRAZZYNESS or would we achieve the Goal of Ernest Koroma's Attitudinal Change ever?
READ ON!!!
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Our Independence in 1961 was for Freedom, Unity (Equality) and Juctice for all. Today we face a situation where Ex Soldiers can without any fear of the Law, BEAT UP the Country's Defence Minister - a sign of TOTAL disrespect for Law and Order and of Authority.
I produce here below, Hansard records of the days when the British Parliament discussed our readiness for Independence and the aftermath of our capabilities to handle things ourselves. 51 years on, we face this brutality and violence tolally unacceptable in a civilised environment. We successfully negotiated the 2007 General elections and we survived the eminent violence - thanks to a mindful and sensible Chairman of the Electorial Commission Dr Christiana Thorpe (or we could have gone the way of the Ivory Coast). We are about to enter fully into the dawn of the next General and Presidential elections in November, and here now at end July/ begining August, we see the Defence Minister being beaten up- clothes thorn in full photographic display. This is a disgrage to the Nation!! The question is were we ready for the Freedom, Unity (Equality) and Justice which we pride ouselves (wrap) ourselves so thightly with the colours of our Flag- the Three-colours- Green, Whit and Blue?
It is an awful shame that even in Today's Political Sierra Leone, we still face this babarick tune of lawlessness. The direction from which this emanates is all to often plain to see. This sort of babaric attitude were well documented in the 1960s and early 1970/80s. Think of Pujehun, "N'Dobogosu ", or the Mana Kpaka experience: are we going to see this sort of political non - briliant approcch to the coming elections that are just round the corner?
TAKE a look at the Brithsh discussion below prior to finalising our Independence Status, and think whether our DEMOCRACy is really POLITICAl CRAZZYNESS or would we achieve the Goal of Ernest Koroma's Attitudinal Change ever?
READ ON!!!
Roughing up the Defence Minister : a pure disgrace!! |
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
SIERRA LEONE INDEPENDENCE
BILL
§Order for Second Reading read.
§ 3.40 p.m.
I beg to
move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.
I have it
in command from Her Majesty the Queen to acquaint the House that Her Majesty,
having been informed of the purport of the Bill, has consented to place Her
prerogative and interest, so far as they are affected by the Bill, at the
disposal of Parliament for the purposes of the Bill.
It is a
great pleasure for me to have the privilege this afternoon of moving the Second
Reading of a Bill that will bring independence to one of the territories for which
we have for a very long time been responsible, indeed, our oldest Colony in
West Africa, for we have been in Sierra Leone since 1787. No doubt hon. Members
have studied the Report of the Constitutional Conference and will remember that
I told the Conference that it was of the greatest importance that the country,
before it became independent, should have shown clearly that she had the
capacity to cope successfully with the problems of full self-government".
For this reason, I was satisfied that it would be wise to allow a period of a
year to elapse after the Conference". The Conference agreed to that and
27th April, 1961, was put forward as the date for the attainment of full
independence by Sierra Leone.
During
the interval since the London Conference the interim changes in the
Constitution then agreed have been brought into effect. So the Ministers have
had considerable experience of the problems that they will have to face for
themselves once their country becomes independent. Last November, the House of
Representatives in Sierra Leone passed a Resolution asking us in the United
Kingdom to introduce the necessary legislation to enable Sierra Leone to become
fully independent from the date I have mentioned. They asked us, also, to 392 support,
with other members of the Commonwealth, Sierra Leone's desire to be admitted to
the Commonwealth when she had obtained independence. As the House will know,
the Commonwealth Prime Ministers, during their recent meeting in London,
expressed their willingness so to welcome it.
I wish to
refer to two matters which have been mentioned to me by hon. Members on both
sides of this House. The first is the suggestion that the Sierra Leone
Constitution should have been available to the House before the Bill was taken.
The second was that the Bill is being taken at somewhat short notice. Although
the second matter is valid, and I shall refer to it, the first point is based
on misapprehension, because drafts of constitutional Orders in Council are not
published before they are submitted to Her Majesty. The procedure we are
following now is exactly the same as the one we followed for Nigeria, although,
for Nigeria, the drafting of the Constitution was very much more complicated.
This does
not mean that the substance of the Constitution is in any way unknown, because
the substance of the Constitution in so far as it is new and does not carry
forward the existing Constitution is laid down in the White Paper to which I
have referred and the Order in Council does no more than clothe that in legal
form. It will be published early in April. I think that it was a valid point
made at Question Time by the right hon. Member for Middlesbrough, East (Mr.
Marquand) that publicity should be given to these matters in Sierra Leone. A
draft Order in Council, comprehensive more to lawyers perhaps than ordinary
people, is not a very suitable medium for that and the Governor is arranging to
publish locally descriptive matter relating to the new sections, in particular,
of the Constitution and to such matters as citizenship and fundamental rights.
Can the
right hon. Gentleman say whether the members of the Legislative Council in
Sierra Leone have had copies of the Constitution?
I think
that they have. I should like to check that particular point. There are two
legal advisers and draftsmen from my Department in Sierra 393 Leone at
the moment. I will check on that point and see whether I can answer it before
the end of the debate.
The
second point, that we are taking the Bill at short notice, is true. I apologise
to the House for that, but it is due to a combination of circumstances which
could scarcely be avoided. It was not possible to draft the Bill in final form
for presentation to Parliament until we knew for certain whether Sierra Leone
would be within the Commonwealth, although one always hoped, and, indeed,
assumed, that that would be so. We therefore had to wait for the recent
Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference before I could publish this Bill.
Moreover,
the first constitutional matter which came before that Conference, the question
of South Africa, which we are to debate later today, took much longer to
discuss than we had expected. In consequence, the Sierra Leone decision was
correspondingly delayed. That was why it was not possible to give any longer
notice of the Bill than has been given. It was laid before the House on the
same day as the Commonwealth Prime Ministers took their decision and we were
able to keep to the timetable for independence on the 27th of next month.
The
population and area of Sierra Leone will make it one of the smaller members of
the Commonwealth, but that in itself is no bar to a country holding its
independence with dignity and ability and playing a substantial part on the
stage of the world. Nor is it a particularly rich country, although, as the
Report I have quoted shows, we have been able to make substantial provision for
financial assistance in the early stages. As those hon. Members who have been
there will know, its economy is mainly agricultural, but it has, in addition,
rich deposits of diamonds and iron ore, and bauxite has recently been
discovered in substantial quantities. I think that there is there a sufficient
economic basis for an independent future. Certainly, Sierra Leone is much
better off than many other countries which have recently come to their
independence.
The
Colonial Development Corporation and the C.D.F.C. are assisting in a major work
of construction of a dam 394 to provide
for the water supply of Freetown and that work will, of course, go on. In
addition, we have promised to give Sierra Leone technical assistance in the
same way as we promised it to Nigeria. The House will recall the announcement
of H.M.O.C.S. That has been offered to Sierra Leone and I hope that it will prove
the means of assisting the country to obtain the services of overseas staff
which it needs. I do not quote any of these things which I have touched on
briefly to draw attention to our own generosity or to detract in any way from
the splendid efforts Sierra Leone herself is making, but simply to show that
our friendship does not consist only of expressions of good will.
The
Constitution is not set out in the Bill. This Bill confers independence and for
the future removes from this House its special obligations in relation to
legislation. The Constitution itself will be set out in the Order in Council.
In that there will be, in particular—I mention this because there has been some
comment recently—provisions in relation to fundamental rights and these will be
entrenched in the Constitution. By entrenching them it means that the
Constitution cannot just be amended by the Government, the House of
Representatives.
Any
alteration of an entrenched provision, as set out in paragraph 20 of the White
Paper, requires, first, that the amendment would have to be carried by a
two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives, then there would have to
be a General Election and, after that, the amendment would again have to be
carried by a two-thirds majority in the new House. So I think that it is clear
that these matters, of which fundamental rights are one of the most important,
are deeply entrenched in the Constitution itself.
There has
also been a considerable campaign in Sierra Leone on the question of holding a General
Election before independence. The position is that when the delegates came to
London they represented a number of different political parties, but they then
agreed to form a united front and, later, a coalition Government, but, of the
26 representatives in London, 25 agreed that there need not be a General
Election before independence, the twenty-sixth dissenting from that view.
395 I make it clear that the life of
the House of Representatives will expire in 1962 and that there will have to be
a General Election then, or before then, in any event. Although it is right to
keep to the decision reached at the Conference, I must make it plain that I am
assured that the Government firmly intend to hold elections, as provided in the
Constitution, after independence.
At the
Conference we also agreed that it would be to the mutual benefit of the two
countries to enter into an agreement on defence matters, but we thought it
equally right to leave that matter over, and not even to negotiate about it,
until Sierra Leone became independent, so that we could then negotiate that
agreement as two equal partners, as we will be after the 27th day of next
month.
I need
not make any particular comments about the Bill itself, which is very much in
common form. Clause 1 provides for the attainment of independence and contains
what I have described as the Statute of Westminster powers. It says explicitly
in subsection (2) that any Act of this Parliament passed on or after the
appointed day shall not extend to Sierra Leone and the Government in the United
Kingdom shall thereafter have no responsibility for the government of Sierra
Leone. Following the Nigerian system, that is absolutely clear.
Clause 2
is the citizenship Clause, and provides both for a transitional period and for
the period after Sierra Leone has passed her own citizenship law. The whole of
the rest of the Bill is entirely common form and the Schedules, with the
obvious and necessary changes, are similar to those who have frequently been
before the House. We have agreed with Sierra Leone Ministers that in so far as
the Bill will be amendable in Sierra Leone, when it becomes an Act, amendments
can be made only by the procedures which I have described for amending the
entrenched provisions of the Constitution.
This
afternoon's short debate is proof again of the coming to completion of the
policies in which we have now been engaged for a long time and of which we are
increasingly seeing the fruits. I pay warm tribute to all those who have
contributed to this progress in Sierra Leone—to the Governor, Sir Maurice 396 Dorman,
and Her Majesty's Overseas Service, past and present. It is a great tribute to
the Governor and to this country that his name has been put forward as the
first Governor-General when Sierra Leone becomes a monarchy under the Crown.
But whatever individual tributes one wishes to pay, the real tribute is to the
people of the country itself, who are now coming forward to independence, and
who, I am sure, will shoulder with courage and responsibility the burdens of
nationhood.
There is
one personal note which I should like to sound. I am sure that we are all
delighted that Her Majesty should have invited the Duke of Kent to represent
her at the independence celebrations, and if I wish him the same success as his
sister achieved in Nigeria I can put it no higher. She had a tremendous time
and I am certain that the Duke of Kent will be equally welcome and equally
successful in Sierra Leone. Sierra Leone, incidentally, is very much looking
forward to Her Majesty's own visit later this year.
The
closing words of the Conference Report read as follows: The Conference
reaffirmed the long tradidition of friendship between Sierra Leone and the
United Kingdom, and the representatives of both made it clear that it was the
intention that their co-operation and friendship should continue. It is in that
spirit that I commend the Bill to the House and in that spirit that we shall
look forward to the future of our relationship with an independent Sierra
Leone.
§ 3.55 p.m.
On behalf
of my right hon. and hon. Friends, I warmly welcome the Bill. We are delighted
that the third former British territory in West Africa is to become
independent. We are all the more delighted that the recent Prime Ministers'
Conference should have welcomed Sierra Leone as a full member of the
Commonwealth. She has decided of her own free will to become a monarchy and we
in the United Kingdom, naturally, cannot help but be pleased about that. I join
with the Colonial Secretary in all that he said in wishing the Duke of Kent a
very pleasant and enjoyable time when he visits Sierra Leone. I am sure that he
will have a right royal welcome.
397 The right hon. Gentleman
referred to questions which we had put from this side of the House about the
delay in presenting the Bill. We were surprised not to have had it before, but
I fully accept the right hon. Gentleman's explanation of that delay. I agree
that the Bill is in common form and, therefore, does not require detailed
consideration after we have discussed it this afternoon.
I was
aware that there were difficulties about publishing an Order in Council before
it was made, but, none the less, I was anxious to draw attention by the
questions I put, to the desirability of making known to the people of Sierra
Leone exactly what was in their Constitution.
In
December, I had the honour to lead a very small delegation to Sierra Leone I
was joined by the hon. and gallant Member for Nottingham, Central
(Lieut.-Colonel Cordeaux) and the hon. Member for Bristol, North-West (Mr.
McLaren). I hasten to add, lest the House be anxious about it, that I had no
difficulty about disciplining my followers on that occasion. They were very well
behaved. All of us on that delegation have vivid memories of the beauty of the
country and the variety of its scenery and the friendliness of its people.
Wherever
we went we were received most cordially, by Sir Milton Margai and his
Ministers, by the trade union leaders, by members of co-operative societies, by
ordinary people, by important people and by less important people all over
Sierra Leone. We were much impressed by the closeness of the connection which
the people of Sierra Leone feel with this country, not merely in Freetown,
which has been more closely associated with Great Britain over many years than
has the Protectorate, but in the Protectorate, also.
With
that, however, there was undeniably some feeling of apprehension and as we went
around some people asked, "Why are you leaving us?". That was how
they expressed it to us. It seemed as though many persons in a variety of
occupations and in different places had a feeling of uneasiness. That did not
exist among the Ministers, of course. It did not exist among the chiefs. Those
people are powerful and are self- 398 confident
in their new mission. I do not for a moment suggest that they are not, but they
are powerful and will be more powerful and they may have good reason not to
feel any misgiving.
Nevertheless,
we felt that there was a feeling of doubt, possibly because it was only three
years between the establishment of a Ministerial system and the giving of full
independence. Perhaps the people did not expect it to come quite so soon.
Readers' correspondence in the newspapers showed that there was, if not
misapprehension, at any rate a good deal of misunderstanding about what
independence involved.
Some of
this arises because the people have a trust in many of those who have been in
charge of their affairs while the Protectorate remained a Protectorate and
Freetown remained a Colony. I hope that one good result will be that the
feeling of doubt as to whether they are fully ready for independence will
translate itself into strong requests to many experienced and skilled
administrators and experts to stay on. I hope that the results of the
negotiations which we provided for in a recent Measure will prove to be
successful. It is clear that large numbers of those people are well liked and
trusted. I hope that they will feel that they can stay, when they are asked to
do so, to help this small country in its further passage towards being a strong
and viable economy.
It is
well known that the history of the country has not always been peaceful. In the
past, there has been strife between the Protectorate and Freetown. There has
been rivalry between various tribes, particularly between the Mende and the
Temene. There may be fear in the minds of some people that this will emerge
again. I suppose that the leaders of the All Peoples' Congress, to whose
correspondence with some of us the right hon. Gentleman referred, had these
various stresses and strains in mind when they put forward their demand for
elections before independence.
We took
pains to see the representatives of the All Peoples' Congress. We were the
guests of the Government, and we had many and frequent contacts with the Prime
Minister, with Ministers and other persons in authority, including 399 many
chieftains. We thought it right and proper that, since representations were
being made to us, we should see Mr. Wallace Johnson, who is, in any case, a
member of the Legislature, Mr. Stevens and others concerned in the All Peoples'
Congress. We gave as fair a hearing as we could to what they had to say, but
none of us was convinced of the full case that they put forward.
After
all, the Conference in London agreed that it was unnecessary to have elections
before independence, and as the right hon. Gentleman said, there was a very
large representation at the Conference of people who had been elected by the
people, although there were some others. It was decided at the Conference in
London that there should be universal suffrage at the next election. It will
inevitably take time to register the women voters who will become the
electorate.
As far as
we could see, there is no real issue to be decided at the moment, because
everybody is in favour of independence, even though some of the simple people
are not quite sure exactly what it will mean. We were not, and could not be,
convinced by the statement that it was Sir Milton Margai's intention never to
have elections again and to establish a one-party State. Now that Sir Milton
has recommended to Her Majesty that Sir Maurice Dorman be the Governor-General,
it is perfectly clear that he could never have had any such project in his
mind, otherwise he would not have asked such a distinguished former Governor
and so devoted an adherent of the parliamentary democratic system which we have
in this country to become the Governor-General.
I extend
my hearty congratulations to Sir Maurice and offer him every good wish in his
future task. He has piloted Sierra Leone very skilfully towards this stage of
independence. I am sure that he will give very wise advice in future when he is
asked to do so. Moreover, Sierra Leone has a stout guardian of democratic
liberties in Mr. Lightfoot Boston, the Speaker of the House of Representatives,
who is an eminent constitutional lawyer and a great believer in the principles
of British common law.
Further,
as the right hon. Gentleman reminded us, an elaborate Bill of Human 400 Rights
will be written into the Constitution. It was agreed in detail at the London Conference.
I am still convinced that it would have been wise to publicise this more than
has been done. People just did not know about it and how thorough, elaborate,
detailed and firm it is. Although I was not convinced by the story that there
would be no elections after independence, I want to say how much I welcome the
statement that the right hon. Gentleman has been authorised to make this
afternoon, namely, that Sir Milton Margai has every intention of having
elections within the due time.
The human
rights section of the proposed new Constitution says this on page 17 of the
Report of the Conference: Everyone who is arrested shall be informed promptly
of the reasons for his arrest and of any charge against him.Everyone arrested
or detained in accordance with"—so and so— shall be brought properly
before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power
and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending
trial. There are some who have been imprisoned recently. I take it that the
statement we heard today clearly means that those who have offended will be
brought to trial quickly if that has not already been done. In the rejoicings
and celebrations of independence perhaps those who may not have committed any
very serious offence may find that they are released.
While we
were in Sierra Leone we had a very interesting discussion in which the hon. and
gallant Member for Nottingham, Central and I took part with some distinguished
representatives of public life in Sierra Leone, one of them being Mr. Stevens,
who has written so many letters to many of us since we returned. The discussion
was about the possibilities of maintaining democratic government in emerging
African territories. That is a very live issue in Africa these days, because
there are examples in Africa, as we all know, of states where the one-party
system prevails and where Parliamentary democracy as we know it does not exist.
The
general conclusion of the very active debate which we had was that the forms of
democracy might differ and 401 that, no
doubt as the result of traditional variations, the exact constitution might not
be the same everywhere in Africa, but we all felt that it was certainly highly
desirable and perhaps absolutely necessary to have within a successful
democracy a lively opposition.
Mr.
Stevens took part in the debate. I am sure that there are legitimate
differences of opinion among the people of Sierra Leone about the present
Government, their policies, and their attitude to certain institutions of a
tribal character. If there are those differences, that provides an opportunity
to Mr. Stevens and Mr. Wallace Johnson and other people engaged in opposition
to make themselves into an effective Parliamentary Opposition. I hope that they
will now devote themselves to organising an opposition, if they wish to do so,
on legal and democratic lines and look forward to getting elected to Parliament
when the elections take place.
The
Secretary of State rightly said at the Constitutional Conference, and repeated
today, that Sierra Leone is not a rich country. There has been a recent large
increase in its national income because of an increase in the output of
minerals. Nevertheless, that total increase in wealth, though large in
proportion, is not large in absolute amount, and the known supplies of diamonds
and iron ore will not last indefinitely, to put it no higher than that. There
are limits to the present known resources.
Bauxite
has recently been discovered, but bauxite is being discovered in many places
just now, in Africa as well as elsewhere. The main wealth of the country lies
in its land and its ability to produce palm oil, and to grow rice, cocoa,
cassava, piassava, cola nuts and, later perhaps, bananas. I believe that they
are experimenting very successfully with the banana crop.
But the
land of Sierra Leone, which is the main source of its wealth, has been injured
much in the past by erosion, as I am sure is known by all who have been there.
The country is not to be compared in wealth with Nigeria not to speak of Ghana,
which is perhaps the richest country in agriculture and forestry in Africa.
Development is badly needed, as elsewhere in such countries, to sustain
existing levels of wealth and to provide for an increase in population 402 as well as
to increase the wealth per head. Funds are needed to be put into the hands of a
people who, as far as we can judge, are very willing to help themselves.
I found
the co-operative movement in Sierra Leone most inspiring. It has expanded
rapidly in recent years. It has 400 societies, with 24,000 members and a staff
of 135, and it has been remarkably successful in arousing the interest of women
which, as all hon. Members who know Africa will appreciate, is a very important
factor.
I do not
think that one can exaggerate the potential importance of this movement in
improving agriculture, in developing a sense of community and in providing a
training ground for democracy; for democracy is by no means only a process of
electing members of a Legislature: it must be practised in daily life to become
deeply rooted in any nation. The same applies to the trade unions. The
mineworkers' union, whose leaders we met and many of whose members we met, too,
seemed to us to be in good shape. Its secretary, I understand, is at present at
Ruskin College, Oxford, following a course of training for his important duties.
This
union and other unions need our help, because they, too, are a training ground
for democracy. These institutions can be as African in character as in make-up.
No doubt they will develop some forms of association or practice which are
different from those of trade unions elsewhere, but upon these foundations of a
keen and eager people, if only we can help them with adequate supplies of
investment capital, a flourishing nation can be built.
Sir
Milton Margai loves the life and culture of the villages, I know; he goes out
and serves his people with his own hands. As he told me with pride and evident
satisfaction, he often delivers babies in the bush with his own hands, for he
is a gynaecologist, trained in Newcastle.
I am sure
that he appreciates and values a thriving life on the land, but much needs to
be done in a country of only 2½ million if it is to become strong and able to
bear comparison with Guinea. This is very important indeed As hon. Members know
very well, the French have done a great deal in 403 developing
territories which were formerly under their control. As figures published
recently by O.E.C.D. show, they have provided a larger amount of aid to their
former colonies than we have provided to ours.
Guinea
has benefited from this and is now receiving aid from Czechoslovakia. I should
like to see Sierra Leone do at least as well, to be as prosperous as Guinea and
to show a good example, under a fully democratic system, of what can be done in
an African country. But much needs to be done in the provision of health,
communications, housing, fisheries, agriculture and education.
The
primary school enrolment in the whole of Sierra Leone was 34,000 in 1950. It
had risen to 69,000 in 1958, but much of that progress and improvement had
taken place in Freetown, which already had substantial educational advantages.
The best calculation which I could make—it may be inaccurate and, if so, I
should like it corrected—was that the chance of a child in the Protectorate
getting primary education is still only one in ten. The Fourah Bay College, the
first college of higher education in West Africa, after all these years has
little over 300 students, and half of those are from Nigeria. It is a far less
impressive undertaking now than Ibadan, not to speak of the enormous college of
technology at Kumasi and the University of Ghana itself.
The
Secretary of State has promised £7½ million over the next three or four years
in loans and grants. He spoke about this today and gave his reasons for
thinking that it was adequate. I hope that he will think again and that, at any
rate, he will agree to review this proposition at the end of a year or eighteen
months to see whether the funds then provided promise reasonably to yield
satisfactory fruit and whether they could be increased.
The major
feeling with which I came back from Sierra Leone was that the needs for
development are urgent, that the capacity of the population is there, that the
willingness of the population to co-operate is rapidly increasing, that
independence should give all this a fillip and that we ought to do more. I
should like to see a special grant right away 404 for the
eradication of malaria. Her Majesty's Government refused to give a grant to the
World Health Organisation for its malaria eradication campaign because they say
that other countries are not paying their whack. That may be true. I do not
dispute it. But why not give to Sierra Leone, as a birthday gift, a little extra,
a special grant? It seems a shame that malaria should still be so widely
prevalent in that country when it has been practically eliminated in British
Guiana, which is a country not dissimilar in make-up.
I hope
that there will be early provision of adequate funds for a co-operative bank.
The co-operative societies are spreading and their growing numbers are becoming
very enthusiastic, but they will not be able to carry on their productive
functions unless they can obtain credit for the farmers who belong to them.
They are not now getting sufficient credit. I should like to see consideration
of a special grant for a co-operative bank.
I should
like to see this country build a number—I do not say too many, because the
teachers might not be available—of primary schools, label them independence
primary schools, and put on the front of them, on a notice, "A gift to
independent Sierra Leone from the independent British people".
In Sierra
Leone, they have had a very long connection with this country. I think that
they value it highly. Let the message go from the House this afternoon that we,
too, value it highly, that we are proud of it, that we want to strengthen it
and that we want it to last through the years. We wish them well. Let us help
them to get off to a good start.
§ 4.20 p.m.
In common
with the right hon. Member for Middlesbrough, East (Mr. Marquand), I regret the
delay in bringing this Bill before the House. Although I recognise the
arguments advanced by my right hon. Friend, I feel that it derogates from the
authority of Parliament that in this matter we must receive the assent of the
Commonwealth Prime Ministers before we can, in our own discretion, grant
independence to a Colony.
Even more
do I regret the haste with which the Bill is being passed through 405 all its
stages. A Colony, with which we have had a connection for over 200 years, is
being, in a sense, disposed of in a few hours. Whereas, yesterday, we discussed
for the whole day a matter of transitory and trivial importance—the salary of
one man—today we are disposing of the destiny of 2 million people in less than
half that time.
I must
confess that, contrary to many hon. Members, I do not greet this Bill with any
enthusiasm, but I fully recognise the compelling reasons which render it
inevitable. I agree that it is far better to yield gracefully now than to
submit later after having put up an opposition which might have caused great
resentment, and the loss of the good will of the people of Sierra Leone. Like
the right hon. Member for Middlesbrough, East, I also had the honour of leading
an all-party delegation to Sierra Leone. That was in 1958. Like the right hon.
Gentleman, I was impressed by the warmth and friendliness of the people. I was,
however, perturbed by certain aspects of Sierra Leone's economy and the fact
that its revenue was very small.
The
income per head of population was not more than £20, and education was only in
its early stages. I estimated that only one child in six had any prospect of
any kind of education.
Will the
hon. Gentleman say whose fault that was? Could not education have been started
years ago?
I hope to
make some reference to that later.
I felt,
apart from the reasons for it, that was a rather insecure basis for
independence. But, since my visit, a great deal has happened in Africa. So many
countries have gained their independence, countries with less financial
resources and smaller populations than Sierra Leone, and with less ability to
control their own affairs. In that comparison Sierra Leone certainly does not
suffer, and it would be quite impossible to withhold from the people of Sierra
Leone the independence for which their democratically elected legislature has
asked. So I join with other hon. Members, not so much welcoming the
independence of Sierra Leone, but certainly in wishing her the best of good
fortune 406 and the
greatest possible prosperity in the future.
There has
been a very long association indeed between Sierra Leone and this country.
Sierra Leone differs from any other country of Africa to which we have granted
independence in that it is not a Colony in the pejorative sense. As hon.
Members well know, it was a settlement of freed men towards the end of the
eighteenth century. It was regarded as a great experiment of what Africans
could do. Although perhaps not all the hopes have been entirely fulfilled, much
has been achieved in the intervening period; and I think that the economy and
progress of Sierra Leone compares very favourably with that of its neighbour,
Liberia, where a similar settlement was made sixty or seventy years later in
the middle of the nineteenth century.
Although
we may criticise our Government for not having done everything they should,
particularly in the matter of education, we must recognise that they have done
quite a lot. It was only after the end of the last war—I think that perhaps all
parties are responsible for this—that there was a recognition that this country
should give some positive aid to the Colonies. Up to that date all we had done
was to marshal the resources of the countries. The resources of Sierra Leone
were not as great as those of Nigeria, and in relation to its population they
were very much less than the resources of the Gold Coast, or Ghana as it is now
called. Therefore, the progress made was less significant than in those other
two territories.
A great
deal that we had done has not been effective. While I was in Sierra Leone I
visited several agricultural stations. They were models of efficiency and
certainly showed the African how to cultivate his crops in a much better manner
than he is doing by the present method of shifting cultivation. But very little
use was made of these stations by the African. He was unwilling to abandon his
traditional methods of agriculture, and side-by-side with the rich corn on an
agricultural station one could see, on the other side of the road, the poor
sparse crop of corn produced by the African.
I think
that independence could have a beneficial effect in such matters. The British
guided and controlled, but they 407 exercised
no compulsion and I was much influenced by, and interested in, the fact that
when Ghana gained her independence the independent Government were able to
stamp out swollen shoot in the cocoa crop, which was threatening that industry,
in a manner in which the British had never been able to do.
I do not
know whether an independent Government enlists greater support from the people
or is able to introduce harsher methods, but at any rate results were rapidly
achieved. In that respect, we failed. The same thing may occur in Sierra Leone.
The methods of agriculture recognised as beneficent may be introduced by an
independent Government, perhaps by a measure of compulsion or because of the
enthusiasm of the people for an independent Government which they would fail to
exhibit towards a colonial régime.
The right
hon. Member for Middlesbrough, East, spoke of the mineral resources of Sierra
Leone. They are impressive, but, of course, they do not have any great effect
on the income of the people, because they affect a relatively small number.
They may raise the income per head of the population by £5. As the right hon.
Gentleman said, the chief basis of the economy is agriculture, and it is only
through an advance in that respect that the standard of living of the people
will be substantially raised.
I hope, I
confidently believe, that when Sierra Leone attains independence, it will
respect the arrangements made with private companies for the development of
iron ore and diamonds. A point which is worthy of mention is that, of roughly
£15 million worth of diamonds produced each year, one-third is produced by the
concessionary company which pays millions of pounds in taxation each year into
the revenue of Sierra Leone. The other two-thirds is produced by private
diggers. When I visited the Colony there were 80,000 of them.
The
revenue accruing to the Government from them is insignificant, as it is founded
on export duty. The limited company has to pay over a high proportion of its
profits by way of taxation. That is something which I think an 408
independent Sierra Leone might well look at. It might be able to use these very
valuable resources in a less wasteful manner than by way of private diggings,
and also bring much more into the coffers of the State than has been put there
hitherto.
In
conclusion, I should like to say to hon. Members that a very great deal of the
smoothness of the operations for independence is due to Premier Sir Milton
Margai and to the Governor, Sir Maurice Dorman. I found Sir Milton Margai a
very wise old gentleman who had a remarkable restraining influence on the wild
elements in the country; a man who earned our respect and deserved our respect.
Sir
Maurice Dorman has undertaken his difficult task of leading the country towards
independence with great ability. I can imagine no man who would so enlist not
only the confidence of his Ministers, but also their affection. I am very
pleased indeed that he will be the first representative of Her Majesty after
independence has been attained.
I wish
the newly independent State of Sierra Leone a prosperous future in co-operation
with this country and with other members of our independent Commonwealth.
§ 4.31 p.m.
We are
today debating the loss of a member of the Commonwealth. At the same time, we
are welcoming, as a member of the Commonwealth, one of our Colonies which we
feel worthy of the status of independence. All of us, I think, would wish the
Colony to thrive, to prosper, and that it should not be founded on the racial
principles which have brought about the loss from the Commonwealth of the Union
of South Africa.
I welcome
the Bill because of my own long-standing friendship with many of the people of
Sierra Leone. It was nearly twenty years ago that, in company with Walter
Elliot and Sir Julian Huxley, I was asked to investigate some of the social,
economic and educational problems of the territory. Later, when I had the
privilege of presiding over the Colonial Office, I discussed with Sir Hubert
Stevenson and the then Governor, Sir Beresford Stooke, the future political
development of Sierra Leone. 409 Neither I,
nor, I am certain, none of those ex-Governors ever thought that within such a
short time Sierra Leone, of its own will, would be independent and the
settlement or Colony working in reasonable harmony with the Protectorate.
I should
like to pay tribute to the initial work done by Sir Beresford Stooke when he
was Governor, and to add that I myself am happy that I had something to do with
the pioneer work which brought about the early constitution changes.
The
granting of the status of independence is something of a bold experiment. We
should recognise that this territory, over the years, has had to contend with
very special difficulties. Our thoughts go back, as the hon. Member for
Liverpool, Kirkdale (Mr. N. Pannell) reminded us, to the settlement established
in a somewhat barbaric country—when an effort was made to found a genuine
Colony or settlement for free men from the United States. There has, of course,
always been some profound division between the Colony and the Protectorate.
That circumstance has been a very real obstacle in constitutional development.
The
Protectorate itself was extremely backward, and was, for a very long period of
years, mostly neglected. Its resources were poor, which made it difficult to
build up any genuine social and economic life, and, in the main, it was
regarded by interests in this country as a territory to be exploited for its
iron ore, its diamonds, and possibly for a few agricultural crops.
One can
quite understand that today there is a degree of uneasiness as to the wisdom of
this Bill, an uneasiness which arises from the doubts which exist as to the alleged
political immaturity of the people and their limited political experience. Also
because of the somewhat limited basis for their economic life. Yet the people
are demanding, with the Colony now reconciled to the Protectorate, and of their
own will, independent status.
I should
like, as did the hon. Member for Kirkdale, to pay tribute to Sir Milton Margai.
I had the privilege of meeting Sir Milton nearly twenty years ago in a very
obscure corner of Sierra Leone. I was introduced to him, curiously enough, 410 by Mr.
Wallace Johnson, who, at this moment, is going through the courts, as he was
then. Sir Milton was doing a remarkable piece of medical and social work in the
remote corner of Bonthe in Sierra Leone. He was said to be, at that time, the
one outstanding intellectual which the Protectorate had produced.
By Sir
Milton's skill in handling experiments in preventive medicine, in dealing with
midwifery and maternity, and in tackling some of the difficult problems of
initiation ceremonies, he showed himself to be a remarkable and unusual person.
Ever since, I have retained a close friendship with him and admired generally
the political work which he has attempted to do. He came into politics not
because of any inner urge on his part but because the people of the
Protectorate claimed his services, so that in the end he felt obliged to give them.
I think
that it should be remembered, when people talk of the immaturity of Sierra
Leone, that, after all, Freetown, over a very long period, has been a great
centre of political discussion and agitation. I recall some of those who acted
as leaders of the people there, who tried to give wise guidance. There was the
late Mayor of Freetown, Dr. Taylor-Cummings, who served with distinction on the
Commission on Higher Education in West Africa. There was Dr. Bright, also, and
even Wallace Johnson, in his turn, contributed something to political
discussion and the political scepticism which is so necessary in the developing
political life of a country.
Let us
not forget, also, the great work and influence of Fourah Bay College and the
pride which the people of Sierra Leone entertain for that college. We owe a
debt to Durham University for standing in the shadows over a long period of
time and helping the college along, in building up its standards. The college
has trained Africans and done much for the general life and indeed. in
inspiring education all along the West Coast. We should remember, that some of
those who have taken an active part in leadership in West Africa, with
moderation and with wisdom, in Nigeria, in Ghana, received their training in
Fourah Bay College. One can hope that the college will go on to full university
status and that, with the advice 411 which has
so frequently been given to it, particularly of late by Mr. Fulton and Dr.
Daish, it will before long attain that goal.
I feel
obliged to voice several doubts which come with independence. The first relates
to the old division existing between the Colony and the Protectorate. It is
perfectly true that there has over the years been an intertwining of interests
and of personnel and an effort to bring the two regions together in a common
political activity and interest. I hope that the prejudices of the past will
completely die and that in legislation and in development there will be a
sustained balance between the claims of the Colony and the claims of the
Protectorate and harmony fully established between the peoples of the two areas.
At the moment, they are integrated sufficiently to demand a common Parliament
for the whole territory.
My second
apprehension arises from the degree of political inexperience which the people
have in the working of democratic institutions. I feel that this must be said.
I am sure that Sir Milton Margai will insist on the highest standards of
integrity in the political life of the country. In the past, we have heard ugly
stories of corruption and nepotism, and we hope that the new country will turn
its back on all that sort of thing. In the evolution from traditional forms of
society to a modern democratic State, there are very real difficulties to be
overcome. I hope that there will be displayed sufficient tolerance and good
will, in the working of political institutions so that modern forms of
democracy as we know them, modified in the light of the traditions of the
country, may be well-established.
I welcome
the announcement by the Secretary of State of his insistence in his discussions
with the Prime Minister of Sierra Leone about the inclusion in the Constitution
of a Bill of Rights embodying the principles of toleration and respect for
minorities and Opposition. In a new territory, working for the first time
towards a genuine democratic system, these things are of fundamental
importance.
Because
any new territory needs a very strong system of administration and of technical
assistance, I urge that we should go as far as we can to persuade our 412 colonial
civil servants to stay and help in the future development of the country. As we
have been reminded today, their service has been of a very high quality in the
past, and that service is still indispensable for the future prosperity and
good life of the country. I hope very much that the administrative framework
will not collapse, but that Africans will be quickly trained to take their
place in the Service while, in the meantime, our own overseas civil servants
are employed in strengthening and helping along the country's life and
administrative arrangements.
Whenever
a territory reaches independence, particularly a territory which is financially
weak, with comparatively limited resources, one factor always stands out. How
is it to face the future with confidence when there is still an infinite amount
of development work to be done both in equipping and building up the economic
resources of the territory and in securing a good standard of life, including
the provision for those social and educational services which are so important
for its general well-being?
Colonial
development and welfare grants will now come to an end for new schemes. The
Secretary of State said that about £7½ million in the immediate future may be
available by way of grants and loans, but for this very poor country to
progress and to establish the standards it will require there will be needed
not only technical aid, but a great deal of further financial support from this
country. After all, this is our responsibility, and it is a responsibility
which we cannot altogether shirk even when a country achieves independence. I
hope, therefore, that the Government will take a very generous view of the
needs of the territory so that the work of development, both economically and
socially, may go ahead.
I join in
congratulating Sir Maurice Dorman, Sir Milton Margai and the people of the
territory who have made independence both possible and practicable. Finally, if
I may, I congratulate the Secretary of State on his courage and audacity at
this time in bringing forward the Bill. He has been going through a somewhat
bitter period, and it speaks well for him that, in spite of the opposition
which has made itself felt among certain supporters of the Government, he
nevertheless remains guilty of what I might call a degree of liberal
enlightenment.
413 I am a fellow sympathiser with
the right hon. Gentleman. When I held office I, too, was frequently attacked
because it was alleged that I was dismembering the Empire and removing colonial
status from the dependencies; in fact, I was making efforts to build up a
Commonwealth fellowship. The people who are bitter in their attacks on the
Secretary of State today are the same people who attacked me when I was engaged
in a similar job of trying to build a Commonwealth. The Secretary of State may
console himself with the fact that at least a number of those who sit behind
him now speak my language and now wear the clothes of Labour's policy. All that
is to the good. I therefore congratulate the right hon. Gentleman on what he
has done. I hope that the Conservative Party will have the good sense to
sustain him in office so that his free and liberal work in the Continent of
Africa and, indeed, in what is left of the Colonial Empire, may go on.
I
congratulate Sir Milton Margai, the Governor and the people of Sierra Leone on
this Bill, and I wish the country all success in the days ahead.
§ 4.51 p.m.
In no
part of the House has there been any wish to delay, much less to hinder, the
passage of this Bill, which will give the people of Sierra Leone their
independence. This is a notable occasion, because it is one on which the
smallest number of people so far to achieve independence are attaining a
position in which they will have to sail out on the comparatively uncharted sea
of management of their own affairs, subject only to the good wishes that we
give them at the outset of their voyage.
Having
said that the sea is uncharted, I should add that my right hon. Friend the
Secretary of State has sought partially to chart it. He has told the House that
there will be inserted in the Constitution, by what he described as entrenched
provisions, a kind of standard of political conduct in the relationship between
the Government and the people which should guide all those who find themselves,
after the passage of the Bill into law, in the position of having to conduct
the affairs of the territory and dominion of Sierra Leone.
414 However, I think it is right to
utter a note of caution about entrenched provisions being placed either in this
Constitution or in the constitution of any other territory which, in the
fullness of time and sooner or later, may be the subject of legislation passed
through this House. It is true that in the Second Schedule of the Bill there is
a provision which states that Nothing in this Act shall confer on the
legislature of Sierra Leone any power to repeal, amend or modify the
constitutional provisions otherwise than in such manner as may be provided for
in those provisions. We can insert those words in an imperial Measure that we are
shortly to pass, but, after we have passed it and independence is achieved, it
will be then that the people of Sierra Leone, through their Government, will
have unlimited power to change their Constitution as they will, and they will
have power to jettison, if foolish enough to do so, the Bill of Rights which is
being entrenched into that Constitution by us today and an accumulated code of
wisdom such as we have collected together over many hundreds of years of
Parliamentary history.
It is
right, therefore, that, in taking up their freedom, which is also their burden
of responsibility, the people of Sierra Leone should recognise that if they are
to make independence a success it is not only independence of the British
Government and of Whitehall that they are achieving. If they are to run their
Constitution properly, it is the independence and freedom of each individual
within the Constitution of Sierra Leone which is at stake. Therefore, we are
right in passing this Measure through as quickly as may be, and I think that
the Secretary of State has the support of the House in what he has done. In
passing the Bill, we hope that in Sierra Leone, in its new-found freedom, there
will prevail those counsels of moderation that we have sought to write into the
code which we hand to them with our best wishes.
I join
other hon. Members in wishing the Government, Parliament and people of Sierra
Leone every success in the great experiment which they are shortly to
undertake.
§ 4.58 p.m.
It is
always a great joy to be in the House on occasions such as this when yet
another African State and another African people are about to win their
freedom. It indicates the great changes which have taken place in this country
when we are willing to accept the great nationalist revolutions of our time,
trying to make our peace with them and to give them a constructive direction.
Like every other hon. Member, I warmly welcome the Bill. Having said that, I
hope the House will forgive me if I make one or two critical remarks which I
feel should be made because this House is interested in human freedom.
I was
very pleased to hear the opening statement of the Secretary of State, namely,
that there would be a general election in Sierra Leone within a year or perhaps
before the year is out. I welcome that statement very much, particularly in the
light of what is unfortunately happening in Sierra Leone at this moment. The
Colonial Secretary mentioned the Constitutional Conference in London in 1959.
He referred to the fact that only one vote, namely, that of Siaka Stevens, was
cast against independence before a general election. Unfortunately, today in
court, at Bow Street, Siaka Stevens was to be ordered to be deported to Sierra
Leone under a warrant. It is sad, but symbolic that on the very day that we are
discussing independence—
Mr. Siaka
Stevens is returning to Sierra Leone. He is not being deported, but is
returning to Sierra Leone voluntarily to stand any criminal prosecution he may
incur there.
Nevertheless,
the point I was making, which I think is a valid point, for the sake of the
future and for the record, is that on this very day, in Bow Street, the first
Minister of Mines and Minerals in Sierra Leone, the leader of its first
organised mineworkers union, the head of the one opposition party that exists
in that country, has had to face a warrant issued against him in his own
country. That has 416 happened
here, in the metropolis of the Commonwealth this very day.
I take a
poor view of a situation of this nature, and it might very well be that if this
good man, Siaka Stevens, had not been able to communicate with me last
Thursday, when he was arrested by four policemen in a most crude fashion, he
might have been deported. The four policemen first went to his son's home, a
boarding house, looking for his father, and then went to Mr. Stevens' hotel. He
was taken to Bow Street and put into the cells, and, if he had not contacted
me, it may very well have been that next day he would have been shipped off to
Sierra Leone in handcuffs and on a warrant.
I make
this point because I think it is dreadfully important for the future of the
people of Sierra Leone. Here we are discussing independence and human freedoms,
and when we do so, no evil consequences can arise for a people by the pursuit
of truth, and that is why I am being so frank, though I am still a supporter of
independence for Sierra Leone. At the Constitutional Conference, four parties
assembled in London—three major parties and two independent representatives
from the diamond area of Kono. Here in London, without any discussion in Sierra
Leone, without any discussion in the House of Representatives, these twenty-six
people got together and formed a Coalition Government by issuing posts in the
new Government with the allocation of jobs to Ministers and Junior Ministers.
No wonder
they got an almost unanimous vote for independence before an election. After
all, the Government of Sir Milton Margai, with all due respect to him, had only
one year to go, and that is not a long time in the history of a country which
has not had its freedom for 250 years. One year is not a long time in the great
struggle for human freedom, and it seems to me that they could have waited
another year, could have had their elections and then independence. I think
that is the democratic way of doing things. I think that it is a violation of
democratic principles for a small group of articulate politicians to come to
London for the constitutional conference and to form a 417 Government
here, without consulting their own people at home and without discussing it in
their parliament.
On their
return to Sierra Leone, the one voice of the opposition, that of Mr. Wallace
Johnson, a great agitator—but all the great things that have happened in this
world, all the rights and freedoms we enjoy, have been won by men like Wallace
Johnson who were never afraid to fight for human rights, irrespective of the
personal sacrifice which they had to make—was silenced. The one opposition
voice in the House of Representatives was silenced, because he was arrested,
and they threw the book at him, just as they threw it as Sieaka
Stevens—sedition, conspiracy, criminal libel, the whole lot. These phrases and
charges are meaningless in African politics, and they are meaningless when we
listen to what is said in election campaigns in any country in Africa. Wallace
Johnston is out on bail of £700, and the one opposition voice is silenced in
the House of Representatives.
There was
another representative from the diamond area who was also a little doubtful
about independence before the election. What happened to him? He went back and
he was tried—an elected representative of the people with a very big
majority—by a tribal court, against which there is not appeal, and he was
sentenced to six months' imprisonment for attacking the paramount chief. I do
not know if there is any reference in this new constitution which checks the
power of the tribal chief in the tribal court, against which there is no
appeal, in regard to the trial of a member of the House of Representatives. It
seems to me that there is to be no change in this tribal system.
I know
the trade union movement in Sierra Leone very well. I have been in contact with
it for many years, and, in its own modest way, my own trade union in this country
has helped it. I received a petition from the Sierra Leone Council of Labour,
which is a very moderate body, as I stated in the House the other day, and, up
till now, has been a nonpolitical body. It has never involved itself in
politics at all, but has kept right out. It was purely and simply working for
trade unionism, is 30,000 strong, and it has a fine system of wage
negotiations.
418 It sent a protest to me, which I
passed on to the Colonial Secretary. What did the protest say? It said that
before the present House of Representatives there are certain amendments to the
law—the Juries Amendment Ordinance—and it insisted that this means that the
system of trial by jury may come to an end. There are three systems of courts
in Sierra Leone and the Protectorate. There is the tribal court, trial by jury,
with a judge and a jury, and another kind of court with a judge and three
assessors. This new ordinance will give the judge appointed by the Prime
Minister exclusive control over the courts, with no jury, with no assessors,
and with no appeal.
I hope
that that will be put right, and I am sure they will put it right. I hope they
will read the HANSARD report of this debate, and that the Government of Sierra
Leone will think again about this ordinance, which will deny many people,
particularly political people and trade unionists, the right to trial by jury
or trial by assessors. I hope they will think again before they pass
legislation of this nature through the House of Representatives. However, I
have received much assurance today from the statement that a general election
will take place. This is what worries people like me and many of my hon.
Friends on this side of the Chamber who are concerned that the people will get
the opportunity of discussing the future of their country and that there will
not be imposed on any new African State a single party dictatorship, and that
the trade union movement, which has grown to strength and power and great
influence under colonial rule, will not lose the privileges it gained even
under colonialism in a new independent African State.
Having
made these critical observations, which I think just had to be made in the
light of the present situation in Sierra Leone, may I say how very much I
welcome this Bill, and how very much I enjoy these occasions when we can say to
millions of people that, after a certain date, they are free to elect their own
Governments and run their own countries in their own way without interference
from abroad.
We need
to assist Sierra Leone for some time to come. Some of the assistance required
is not massive sums of 419 capital
investment. From my own experience, I suggest that assistance in small,
strategic directions is of great immediate importance to these small African
countries whose economy is based on agriculture. They need help to extend their
co-operative buying and selling. They want a few technicians to explain to them
how to keep the books, how to buy and sell at the right times, how to develop
means of mutual aid and self-help, how to run their co-operative banks, as my
right hon. Friend the Member for Middlesbrough, East (Mr. Marquand) so rightly
said.
These
countries need to be shown how to operate credit facilities, so that the
farmers' co-operatives can obtain credit for nine months in the year until they
harvest their crops. They need advice on the development of small handicraft
industries. It is this kind of help, which does not involve hundreds of millions
of pounds but goodwill and wise advice, which is needed. It involves sending
out people to countries like Sierra Leone who believe in human freedom, who
understand the need for mutual aid and self-help, who are dedicated to the job,
and who understand the simple needs of African agriculture.
If we can
have a continuous flow into Sierra Leone of people like that, there will be no
danger of a single-party dictatorship, because out of the co-operatives and
trade unions the people will learn democracy. They will learn how to run their
own farms, villages and little industries, and out of this experience they will
know how to run their own government, and no one party will be able to deny
them the rights which they should be assured by this Bill.
§ 5.13 p.m.
Along
with many other hon. Members who have spoken in this debate, I have great
admiration for the way in which Sir Milton Margai has led his country forward
to the state in which many of us welcome the introduction of this Bill. It is
undeniable that he has been better capable of holding his followers together
than has the right hon. Gentleman the Leader of the Opposition. But I cannot
share the view, which seemed implicit in the remarks of the hon. Member for
Bilston (Mr. R. Edwards)—who, I know, 420 takes a
very deep interest in the affairs of Sierra Leone—that the General Election
which is coming along will be "cooked" and will not be a free one.
That seemed to be the tenor of his remarks, but I am sure that that will not be
so.
A
transitional period is a difficult one, particularly for overseas civil
servants. It redounds much to the credit of Sir Milton Margai and his Ministers
that this transitional period in Sierra Leone should have been so free of
friction. A great deal is due also to the wise management of Sir Maurice Dorman.
No better monument to this period of co-operation could have been given than
the choice of Sir Maurice to be the first Governor-General of independent
Sierra Leone.
In many
ways, Sir Milton has a close political relationship with Earl Attlee. Both men
are deceptively strong. Both have a considerable fund of commonsense, and both
shun the political and social limelight. I, too, had the advantage of being a
member of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association Delegation that visited
Sierra Leone. Sir Milton, as Prime Minister, was good enough to give a
reception for us. At that reception, a new recruit to the secretariat, inbued
no doubt by the British Council's ideal that people should meet people, went up
to a lonely figure standing in the shadows and asked him whether he could
introduce him to any of the people at the reception. That lonely figure turned
out to be our host, the Prime Minister of Sierra Leone.
Sir
Milton and his successors will, I am sure, always be welcome in this country. I
have no doubt that they will make a valuable contribution to the Commonwealth
Prime Ministers' Conference when they come. But the introduction of this Bill
prompts some thoughts on the problems of what happens to the Commonwealth Prime
Ministers' Conference following this Bill. Tanganyika and the West Indian
Federation will almost certainly be making application to become full members
of the Commonwealth within the next twelve months.
There is
a possibility that Western Samoa, with a population of about 100,000, will also
be making such an application. British Guiana and other 421 countries
are certainly not far down in the queue. It seemed to me that we had already
become dangerously close to the level of farce at Chequers the weekend before
last, when Prime Ministers seemed to scurry in and out. If that is a model for
the future, then there is considerable room for disquiet.
One can
imagine that no sooner is His Beatitude the President of Cyprus putting a tasty
morsel of chicken into his mouth than the butler will blow a whistle, the plate
and chair will be swiftly taken away and a new place laid for the Prime
Minister of British Guiana. It seems to me already that the whole nature of the
Prime Ministers' Conference is changing.
Once we
were told that the whole Conference was an informal meeting of minds. Now,
however, things are very different. Only yesterday, in answer to a question
from the right hon. Member for Easington (Mr. Shinwell), my right hon. Friend
the Prime Minister said: … I would remind the right hon. Gentleman that not
only do we have the plenary discussion but, now that quite a number of Prime
Ministers are concerned, we have a number of informal discussions between
groups of Prime Ministers on various subjects £"—[OFFICIAL REPORT, 21st
March, 1961; Vol. 637, c. 206.] It seems that, with the increase in the number of
Prime Ministers, informality is moving from the body of the Conference itself
into the ante-chambers. To me, that seems to be a move much to be regretted,
but this afternoon legitimate concern about the way in which the Commonwealth
Prime Ministers' Conference goes should in no way detract from the very warm
welcome which we give to Sierra Leone as a new member of the family of the free
Commonwealth.
§ 5.20 p.m.
It so
often happens in debates on independence Bills that the debates take place in
an atmosphere of crisis, the Government finding themselves facing an impossible
situation and having to deal with it. This is a very welcome exception to that
generality, and I congratulate the Colonial Secretary very warmly indeed on
anticipating the legitimate aspirations of the people of Sierra Leone.
Undoubtedly the Prime Minister of Sierra Leone and the present Governor have
made a very great contribution towards what I think is the fairly uniform 422 spirit in
Sierra Leone towards independence.
I do not
take the view that the present Coalition is a forced coalition. I found when I
was there not long ago a desire among all sorts of people at this moment to be
united in, as it were, presenting a case to the British Government, and then
afterwards going to the polls. I found it very pleasing that Christians and
Muslims in the Protectorate, Creoles, ordinary trade union leaders from the
branches, and the chiefs were all thinking of independence through—at the
moment—this Coalition. I think one can congratulate both the people of Sierra
Leone and the Colonial Secretary on bringing to pass this Bill to enable the
people to realise their proper aspirations.
Sierra
Leone is a very loyal country. It has a very fine tradition of Christian
education and Christian self-help. I had the pleasure of visiting the original
Fourah Bay College at Regert, founded in 1827, which has made a remarkable
contribution to the governing of the Commonwealth and Empire, and it is a very
great tribute to the energies and forethought of the people of Sierra Leone.
The Church Missionary Society, which founded the college, as far back as 1827,
set about training the local people, their teachers, their clergymen, and, in a
lesser degree, administrators, to run Sierra Leone and, incidentally, to make a
contribution towards the development of Nigeria. I am very proud that I have
been associated with the University of Durham in giving this institution in
latter days a modern touch. Some of my own staff, when I was at Durham
University, went out to found there extra-mural work which, after a number of
vicissitudes, is again flourishing. One of my friends will be going out, I
hope, in a few days' time, to help in a crisis in a department of the
university.
One
particular example of this friendliness towards Britain and loyalty to Britain
can be found at Bo, the capital of the Protectorate, where the Prime Minister
and the people of Bo and the Government have made a very massive contribution
to the building of the British Council's headquarters there. Some months ago
the Select Committee on Public Accounts made some suggestions about the British
Council financing part of its work from the countries in 423 which it
works. In poor Sierra Leone—I mean in the monetary sense—there is this massive
contribution to the encouragement of interest in Britain. I think that the
friendliness of the people and Government towards the British Council was
remarkably demonstrated in developing that centre.
Wherever
I went, wherever I was, I found the very greatest friendliness towards British
people. For instance, at a most lively lecture in the Union Society of Fourah
Bay College and at a very charming reception from the Women's Co-operative
Guild at Bo.
I enjoyed
the most heart-warming contacts in the extra-mural classes in Freetown, Newton
and Lunsar. Everywhere I got the feeling of a developing solidarity based on
the coming of independence, and I hope that this will be a good sign that in
the future the Government will develop still further democratic forms capable
in looking after Sierra Leone's real interests.
Having
said that, I cannot share the Colonial Secretary's complacency about the manner
in which the constitutional provisions have been made. It may be that there
were difficulties about the Commonwealth Conference and the timing of the Bill,
but certainly there needed to be much more publicity in Sierra Leone with a
clearer setting out of what was coming, and no where is this more important than
in the financial arrangements.
I found
that at Fourah Bay College the whole future was most uncertain. They were
telling me they might be faced with cancelling further building contracts and
the dispersal of the direct labour force which has done such a wonderful job of
late. They cannot get any certainty about next year's capital grants. I think
that this points to very serious flaws in the relations between the Colonial
Office and the Commonwealth Relations Office and the Departments which deal
with C.D. and W. grants.
I was
very pleased that yesterday the Prime Minister announced the setting up of a
Department of Technical Co-operation, and I hope very much indeed that in
future developments of this sort that Department will be able to make a much
smoother transition on the financial side than there has been in Sierra 424 Leone.
Wherever I went I found examples not exactly of the break down of co-operation
but of uncertainty as to the future where there ought to have been pushing
forward with new developments.
To take
another example, about which I have written to the Colonial Secretary, and I am
inclined to agree with his answer. In the Protectorate there is magnificent
work in teaching literacy. The Literacy Bureau is in great difficulties. It is
struggling to teach enough people to read and is having difficulty in providing
them with enough to read when they have become literate. For a long time it has
made requests for an automatic printing press to enable it to print far more.
When I wrote to the Colonial Secretary and asked him if he could do anything
about this at this late hour his reply was, I think, perhaps constitutionally
right, that it was late in the day to pick out particular items for
development, but I think it would have been very much better if the financial
terms and details had been so published that they would have given some hope to
the college and the Literacy Bureau and a pointer to the way they could go in
the future. I know that now these matters are for the independent Government,
but I think that this is the sort of thing we should safeguard when we make
other arrangements in the future.
Take
another very impressive scheme, the Guma Valley water and electricity scheme.
Five years ago I was taken round to see some of the work. It is still not
complete. The whole scheme is beyond the unaided financial resources of
Freetown. Dams are very unfortunate things in the history of the Conservative
Party. The Aswan Dam started consequences which have not finished yet. It is
true that the Guma Valley scheme is a much smaller one and not charged with the
dynamite of failure as was the Aswan Dam, but there is very great need for
things to be done and things to be said to bring a successful termination to
projects of this magnitude.
The
Colonial Secretary probably knows that there are now no internal airlines in
Sierra Leone. The three aircraft which were maintained are grounded, and will
be grounded permanently, for I doubt very much whether they can fly again. Here
again is something which it seems to me 425 ought to
be dealt with speedily and ought to be dealt with as a contribution to the
development of Sierra Leone.
The past
history of the Colonial Office in the building of roads in Sierra Leone is
deplorable. Five years ago the tarred road from Freetown went 51 miles. Now,
five years later, it goes only 91 miles. More bridges have been built, and
there has been some progress with dirt roads, but if we compare the progress in
Sierra Leone with that in Ghana, then Sierra Leone stands out as a black spot
on the record of the Colonial Office.
I could
go on enumerating these projects concerning which I found it very distressing
that there was not more hope for the future and more tangible evidence of
things about to be done. I have written to the Colonial Secretary about the
training college and about one or two other matters as well. One particular
project in connection with Fourah Bay College in which I think the Colonial
Secretary should take more interest is the question of the staff being treated
on the same basis as civil servants. Certainly something ought to be done to
put the staff of Fourah Bay College on the same level as civil servants in
relation to compensation and superannuation. I hope that the Colonial Secretary
will apply his mind to that matter.
We are
certainly not doing enough in the way of putting forward our own material in
Sierra Leone, not in the way of propaganda but in the way of making it easy for
its people to learn what is going on in England and to have easy opportunities
of learning about England. Could not Her Majesty's Stationery Office
publications be made available to Commonwealth universities and university
colleges free? Could we not have some reciprocal arrangement with the
Commonwealth by which our universities would have much easier and cheaper
access to their Government publications?
I found
it upsetting, for example, when in anticipation of this debate I wanted to get
a number of publications from the Crown Agents about Sierra Leone. I found,
first of all, that I had to buy them and then that they were not available
either in the Library of the House or immediately in the Crown Agents Office.
Surely some imagination could be applied to this matter. Russian propaganda
goes into every grammar 426 school in
Sierra Leone. The Russians go to great trouble to provide scholarships, and a
number of Fourah Bay College students and sixth form students find their way
from time to time to Russian and Czech universities, and, I think, to Chinese
universities.
We really
must be more positive in our relations with Sierra Leone. The people there are
loyal and friendly. They have this very long tradition and we must certainly
brighten up our ideas in providing easier and more information about Britain.
I was
very pleased to see that in Nigeria there is being developed what looks to be a
most excellent scheme for the vacation training of teachers. I hope that Sierra
Leone will work out something of that sort, as well, in collaboration with the
Commonwealth Relations Office and the Ministry of Education.
Finally,
I hope that in the matter of low-cost houses, even when Sierra Leone is
independent, our Government will take some practical steps to see that housing
there is developed with capital invested by us. When the Governor addressed the
House of Representatives on 11th February, 1960, he said: Sierra Leone's
gravest problems will not be concerned with most of the matters mentioned just
now"—that is, the struggle for independence, with constitutional forms,
with the exercise of political and other power, or with the winning of
democratic rights. Those are hers now. The struggle Sierra Leone has on its
hands is primarily economic and financial. I hope very much that when the
Parliamentary Secretary replies he will be able to speak constructively about
what the Government's opinions are, not only on spending the £7½ million but
with regard to seeing that the development of the country can be continuously
aided by Britain and that from an improving economic base its democratic
traditions can be advanced.
§ 5.34 p.m.
Like the
hon. Member for Bishop Auckland (Mr. Boyden), in general terms I welcome the
Bill. I propose to take up the time of the House for only a very few minutes
because many hon. Members on both sides know Sierra Leone better than I do. I
remember the beauty of 427 the old
Colony. I was tremendously impressed with the iron ore development, and I
enjoyed greatly the superb port facilities of Freetown. But what I remember
most of all is the great friendliness of the people of Sierra Leone.
I count
among my particular friends not only Sir Milton Margai and many members of his
Cabinet. Only a few weeks ago Mr. Siaka Stevens, to whom the hon. Member for
Bilston (Mr. R. Edwards) referred, was a guest in my home. I do not want to
judge in any way what is a matter which must be sub judice, but I think it is
well to remember that, as far as I know, every single Sierra Leone party in the
last general election stood for independence for Sierra Leone within the
lifetime of the present Parliament. That is apt to be forgotten.
It is not
for me to balance the arguments of Mr. Siaka Stevens who, after all, stood at
that election. It was found that his election was invalid because of corruption
and bribery. He told me in my own home of his fear of customary or tribal
justice to which the hon. Member for Bilston has referred. I am only glad that
he is returning to Sierra Leone of, I gather, his own free will and is not
being directed in any way by the Government of this country.
I must
apologise to the House for not having been present throughout the whole debate,
but I had to receive the Parliamentary delegation from Eire. The leader of that
delegation, the Speaker of the Dail, first came to this country as a guest of
Her Majesty, as a political prisoner in Wandsworth Gaol. How lucky, I am sure
we can all agree, that the relations between this country and Ireland have
taken an immense turn for the better. How much more lucky are we really that
the relations between this country and Sierra Leone are what they are and that
nothing of that sort has ever happened in the past. We can indeed be grateful
for the moderation and the common sense of men like Sir Milton Margai, who
reminds me very much of the statesmanship of his opposite number on the east
coast of Africa, Mr. Nyerere.
I should
like to add my commendation to the words of other hon. Members on the
appointment of Sir Maurice Dorman at the request of Sir Milton Margai as Her
Majesty's Governor- 428 General. I
should also like to say what pleasure we feel that Mr. J. B. Johnston, whom
many of us will remember as Lord Boyd's private secretary, should be our future
High Commissioner in Freetown. I only hope that in due course he will have a
better house in Freetown than the present High Commissioner has in Lagos.
I agree
with the hon. Member for Bishop Auckland in his fear for the economic future of
Sierra Leone which is dependent on iron ore and bauxite, which, of course, is
found the world over, and on diamonds. I am delighted that the revenue from
diamonds has gone up in the last year from £6 million to about £15 million
through stopping the passage of diamonds over the border. But, even so, Sierra
Leone is going to be a very poor country, and I am wondering whether she can
afford all the embassies which so many countries in Africa and Asia try to
support. Naturally, she must be represented in a major way at the United
Nations and in this country, but it may well be that she could be represented
by another Commonwealth country, be it Nigeria or Ghana, or even by ourselves,
in many other territories of the world. I understand that is costs at least
£10,000 a year to keep one representative overseas, and we have got to balance
the panoplies of diplomacy against the immense need in countries like Sierra
Leone for development and for education.
One final
word on education. In the primary schools there was an enrolment of only 69,000
in 1958, which was only one-quarter of the children in the country, and no more
than 6,000 enrolled in the secondary schools. Of all the territories in Africa,
east or west, Sierra Leone has, I think, the lowest percentage of children of
school age receiving education. I am not proud of that, because, after all, the
United Kingdom has been responsible indirectly for Sierra Leone for a very long
time. I am merely stressing this fact because of the immense need of outside
assistance and technical aid which will exist for a long time in Sierra Leone.
In
Fourah, I am told, last year only 189 pupils passed the West African G.C.E.,
and of the 400 students at Fourah Bay about one-half came from Nigeria and, no
doubt, will return to Nigeria. So Sierra Leone is going to 429 be
desperately short of intelligent and well-educated people to govern, expand and
develop her territory. But she at least enters independence united. No longer
is there tremendous feeling against the Protectorate or a feeling in the
Protectorate that the people there are treated as backward people by the
Creoles of the Colony.
Sierra
Leone is now one country. She has been an old friend of ours for many years.
From the earliest days she has been attracted to Europe and, above all, to this
country. She has shown her friendship to us in two major wars. May she continue
to show her friendship and may we continue to extend our help to Sierra Leone.
§ 5.42 p.m.
I am
sometimes a critic of the Government's colonial policy, and therefore it gives
me special happiness now to congratulate the right hon. Gentleman the Secretary
of State for the Colonies on the introduction of this Bill, and not only the
right hon. Gentleman but statesmen in Sierra Leone and all those who have
contributed to this achievement.
This Bill
marks an amazing development in West Africa. It follows Ghana and Nigeria, and
I should think that something like 50 million Africans in West Africa who were
in our Empire are now self-governing and independent. That is quite an
extraordinary development. There is left only Gambia, with very special
circumstances, which may have to become incorporated in other territories
rather than becoming independent itself.
I want to
put a point to the Secretary of State concerning procedure. I am not critical
of the delay in the introduction of the Bill. I think it was inevitable in the
circumstances. But I ask the right hon. Gentleman seriously to consider whether
the whole procedure by which we discuss these Bills should not be revised. The
constitutional conference took place ten months ago. I suppose I am one of the
fortunate Members, because I saw the draft constitution then, studied it in
detail and gave some African members of the conference advice about it. But
this House today is passing this Bill without ever having seen the constitution
at all.
430 I believe I am correctly
informed that at least until three days ago the members of the Legislature in
Sierra Leone also had not seen the constitution. I appreciate that this is a
matter of protocol, but I am asking the right hon. Gentleman to consider
whether it is not possible to have some revision of these arrangements. It is
unsatisfactory that this Parliament should be passing a Bill without knowing
what are the contents of the constitution, and it is also unsatisfactory that
Members of the Parliament in Sierra Leone, which is to have its independence,
should still be unaware of the contents of the constitution. This matter
affects not only our Parliament but their Parliament, and it is of great
importance that, if there is to be real democracy in Sierra Leone, the people
of Sierra Leone should be informed about the constitution.
I wish to
make only one comment on the constitution as I have seen it. I welcome the Bill
of Rights. My only criticism of that would be that human rights take a rather
subordinate position to rights of property. The rights of property are actually
in the body of the constitution. The Bill of Human Rights is an appendix to
that constitution, and I think that is a wrong priority.
As I have
said, I welcome the Bill, but nevertheless one must appreciate that there is
some uneasiness in Sierra Leone at this moment. I am glad that the old conflict
between the Protectorate and the Colonies has become so much eased and that
there is now much better feeling between them. But the Secretary of State knows
that there is uneasiness in Sierra Leone on other matters. Two members of the
Legislature have been arrested, are on bail and are to be tried. In addition,
members of the executive committee of the opposition party are in a similar
position.
I am very
concerned that Sierra Leone shall start on the course of independence with
political rights and liberties. Only yesterday in the House, after I had put a
certain question, an hon. Member opposite rose and by implication suggested
that I had not been critical when liberties had been denied in Ghana. In fact,
I have been critical. I have raised those issues with the President of Ghana
both privately and publicly, as the right 431 hon.
Gentleman knows. I want to see Sierra Leone starting out in a spirit of
democracy and with personal liberties which shall not be spoiled as they have
been spoiled in certain other African countries.
Because
of that I also welcome the right hon. Gentleman's statement today that there
will be a general election in Sierra Leone within one year. I am glad that an
assurance to that effect has been given him by the Prime Minister of Sierra
Leone. I hope that that provision for an election within one year of the
acceptance of independence will lessen the fears and tensions now operating in
Sierra Leone.
I want to
make one personal appeal to Sir Milton Margai, the Prime Minister, who will be
the head of the independent Government. I appeal to him, before independence is
introduced, to declare an amnesty so that Members of Parliament and members of
a party executive who are now charged may be liberated. In this way, the
independence of Sierra Leone can begin in an atmosphere in which there will be
hope for full democracy, full liberty and, because of those things, with the
full co-operation of the people.
To that
appeal to the Prime Minister of Sierra Leone, I add an appeal to the Secretary
of State to the Colonies and to the Government. Evidence has been given from
both sides of the House of the absence of education, of economic development
and even of roads in Sierra Leone. We in this Parliament have a great deal of
responsibility for that. I am asking the Secretary of State to say today that,
despite the fact that Sierra Leone will become independent, we shall give the
greatest possible help to remedy those defects, that we will give the greatest
possible help in industrial development, in road building, particularly in
schools and in crowning the elementary schools with secondary schools.
I am
appalled to hear, as I have heard in this House this afternoon, that the
campaign against malaria in Sierra Leone is being held up because our
Government have not given adequate contributions for that purpose. There need
not be in three years' time a single case of malaria in Sierra Leone. We have
ended it over vast areas of Africa. 432 It could
be ended if there were adequate expenditure upon it and proper technical aid so
that this should be done.
I ask the
Secretary of State, not merely to have the honour of introducing this Bill to
extend independence to Sierra Leone, but, before the Bill is passed, to assure
this House and the people of Sierra Leone that we will provide a social and
economic foundation upon which that independence can develop, not only to true
democracy, but to true happiness in the ordinary life of the men and women of
the territory.
§ 5.54 p.m.
I have
promised to be very short and I will be. As the right hon. Member for
Middlesbrough, East (Mr. Marquand) said, I was a member of the delegation which
he led in December to Sierra Leone and of which, I might add, the right hon. Gentleman
was a kindly and stimulating leader. It is rather attractive that when so many
other parts of Africa are stormy we should be able to turn for a short time to
Sierra Leone where independence is coming so smoothly and happily.
It is
fortunate that the Prime Minister of Sierra Leone is Sir Milton Margai. Those
who know him know how well qualified he is to lead the country into
independence. His work as a gynaecologist has made him widely known in the
parts of the country where he practised. That has made many people look on him
as their friend and feel personal gratitude for him. In that way he has built
up a fund of personal good will. It is characteristic of his vitality that even
now, when he is in the middle sixties, he is still no mean athlete.
It is
excellent news that Sir Maurice Dorman, now the Governor, is to be the first
Governor-General. Those who know how closely he and Lady Dorman have identified
themselves with the life of the country and who know the warm regard that is
felt for them will think that no better choice could have been made.
In recent
years the grants which this country has made under the Colonial Development and
Welfare Acts have been very valuable, but there is still much that remains to
be done to develop the social services, to expand education, 433 to improve
the road communications, to which the hon. Member for Bishop Auckland (Mr.
Boyden) referred, to build more bridges and to clean up the slums of Freetown.
There is no system of social security yet. When people fall out of their
employment they have to live off the charity of their relations.
When one
travels by boat along Freetown Harbour, one finds a moving sight, the historic
stone stairs up which the thousands of slaves climbed to find themselves free
men on setting foot in Sierra Leone. That is why the capital is called
Freetown. The settlement was started at the end of the eighteenth century by
Granville Sharp, who was a friend of William Wilberforce, for rescued slaves
and Africans repatriated from the West Indies. He did it as a generous attempt
to atone for the horrors of the slave trade. The descendants of those people,
the Creoles, are still influential in Freetown.
Here at
Westminster, one of the best and most disinterested chapters has been the moral
campaign for the abolition of slavery and the slave trade. In a sense, we are
today writing the final chapter in that long and honourable story when we
welcome Sierra Leone as a fully independent member of the Commonwealth.
§ 5.58 p.m.
It would
be a pity if all the hon. Members who have spoken from both sides of the House
in this debate were to have avoided, as it has perhaps so far seemed almost
ostentatiously, following up the main part of the speech of the hon. Member for
Bilston (Mr. R. Edwards). Therefore, although I do not want to go into the
matter deeply, because I have no doubt that it will be dealt with by my hon.
Friend the Under-Secretary of State when he replies to the debate, having met
Mr. Stevens on two occasions when I was recently out in Sierra Leone and on one
occasion recently in this country, I should like to say that it certainly is
tragic that the events described by the hon. Member for Bilston should have
come to our notice on the very day that we are taking the Second Reading of
this Bill, which in the ordinary way should be an entirely happy occasion
unmarked by any tragedy of this nature.
434 I shall be brief, not because I
feel that this debate on such an important subject should be cut down to make
way for a full five hours on the troubles in South Africa but because, as I am
the last speaker to be called before my hon. Friend the Under-Secretary sums up
the debate, most of the points that could be made have already been made by
others.
I
certainly do not want to repeat them, but out of gratitude alone I should like
to say something because I was, as has been mentioned, a member of the
delegation to Sierra Leone three months ago which was led, if I may say so,
with such charm of manner and with such ability by the right hon. Member for
Middlesbrough, East (Mr. Marquand). The tremendous kindness that we received
from everybody there, from Sir Milton Margai, the Prime Minister, down to the
ordinary villagers in the most distant villages of the Protectorate, is a
memory I shall treasure for a long time.
Hon.
Members have very differing views about the value of that type of visit. Many
hon. Members think that all such Parliamentary delegations are a complete waste
of time and money, and have some extremely acid comments to make about people
who come back after visiting for about ten days some part of the world that
they have never seen before, and then set themselves up as experts on the
country concerned. There are others, of whom I am one, who think that there is
inestimable value to be obtained from such visits, and that the more of them that
can be paid by hon. Members the better.
The
principal impression that I obtained from my visit to Sierra Leone was of the
remarkable harmony and sense of partnership with which two different races, our
own people and those of Sierra Leone, were working together for the good of the
country and its advancement towards independence.
Only one
controversial point came up during the Constitutional Conference last April,
and it has not so far been referred to in this debate. I speak of the defence
agreement that it was decided should be negotiated between ourselves and Sierra
Leone after independence had been granted. That part of the agreement was
challenged by the newly-forming Opposition under Mr. Stevens and Mr. Wallace 435 Johnson,
and it has also been commented on adversely to me by some people from Sierra
Leone whom I have recently met in this country.
A lot of
them see in the defence agreement a sort of hangover of colonialism on our
part. It is true that such an agreement with Sierra Leone would be of use to
us. Anyone who can remember the vast conveys assembling during the last war in
that magnificent harbour at Freetown will hardly challenge that. But whereas
such an agreement may be useful to us, I think that it is of far greater
potential value to the people of Sierra Leone.
Some of
them have asked me, "What do we get out of that, except a certain amount
of embarrassment? Who on earth would we want to be defended against? Who will
attack us?" Well, if one looks around Africa as it is today, and as it has
been in the last few years, I think it would be agreed that it would be a very
complacent citizen of Sierra Leone who would say that never in the future did he
think that the people there might be glad to have someone close at hand and
able to help them, someone such as ourselves, who, I am certain they all
believe, will ever remain one of their best friends.
Another
matter referred to by a number of speakers is the definite feeling of what
might be called unease that members of the delegation sensed amongst many
people in Sierra Leone about the advent of independence. I believe that when my
hon. Friend the Member for Liverpool, Kirkdale (Mr. N. Pannell) led a delegation
to Sierra Leone some two years ago, he said that there was widespread
enthusiasm there for independence. I can well believe that, but it always
happens that when these events become imminent people begin to have their
doubts. Some of the people living far out in the Protectorate in Sierra Leone
certainly cast their eyes across the border to other countries in Africa where
independence—that word that many of them so vaguely understand—has become a
fact, were not entirely pleased with everything they saw.
However,
my belief is that the people of Sierra Leone need not be too nervous about the
coming of independence, quick 436 as it is.
The constitutional steps taken towards it in the last year or two have
admittedly been rapid, but I feel that they have been very well timed and that,
as a result, the transition will be smooth. It only remains for me, therefore,
to join with previous speakers, and, I am sure, with every other hon. Member,
in wishing the very best of luck and the greatest prosperity in the future to
our new partner in the Commonwealth.
§ 6.6 p.m.
We have
had more than a formal debate this afternoon on this great step forward for
Sierra Leone. On all sides there have been well-informed Members advising both
the Government and those who will inherit power on certain steps that it would
be mutually advantageous for the two countries to take after April, when the
people of Sierra Leone will have power devolved upon them. It is only fair,
therefore, that in the short time at my disposal I should attempt to answer
some of the main points that have been made.
Reference
has been made to the delay in the publication of the Bill, but we have had to
wait. It will be seen from the Title that this is a Bill to Make provision for,
and in connection with, the attainment by Sierra Leone of fully responsible
status within the Commonwealth. We had to wait until the Commonwealth
Conference took place. We could not publish this Title until that Conference
had welcomed Sierra Leone's joining the Commonwealth.
A point
has also been made about lack of publicity of the precise terms of the
Constitution. This is a matter at which my right hon. Friend and I will look
but, of course, we are up against problems of precedent. It is fair to say that
this draft Constitution will contain only those provisions agreed by the
Conference last year. They could, in fact, have been published earlier and I
agree that, perhaps, in the future we should have a wider degree of latitude.
Looking back, what we should perhaps have done was to make more public the
findings of the actual Conference in London last May. I shall certainly look at
that matter again.
The right
hon. Member for Middlesbrough, East (Mr. Marquand) said that 437 there was
need for a lively Opposition in the new Sierra Leone. There, we fully agree.
The main
point raised from the benches opposite was on the question of financial aid to
a territory which is not, by its nature, rich. I want also to answer some of
the detailed matters raised by one of my hon. Friends who has just returned,
and by the hon. Member for Bishop Auckland (Mr. Boyden), who referred
specifically to aircraft and the Guma Dam. First, the contract for the dam has
been awarded. Secondly, from colonial development and welfare funds we are
replacing the Rapide by the new Pioneer aircraft.
On the
wider issues, we have here a territory which, compared with other territories
in Africa, is not rich. I am sure that when hon. Members on both sides say that
the true and abiding wealth of Sierra Leone lies in its land, they are right.
As one of my hon. Friends remarked, the output from the diamond industry has
gone up with improved control of the industry, and the iron ore and bauxite
possibilities of the country remain great; but the main wealth must remain in
the land.
I think
that the offer of my right hon. Friend to continue to provide the Sierra Leone
Government with technical assistance after independence is of great importance.
Also, the provisions decided upon at the Conference are of great importance.
First, there are the financial aids, which will continue, though here again,
because of the change of status, there will have to be some alteration in the
C.D. and W. and even the C.D.C. assistance. But I can say that all schemes
already entered into will be completed. The C.D.C. has an important part to
play in the water supply scheme, which is going forward, and in other schemes.
Beyond
the existing schemes, I think it worth reminding the House that there are the
chances of assistance from the C.D.F.C., and that, already, £400,000 is going
into the large water scheme from this source. There are also other
international funds which are available for development and, in addition,
recourse to the London market as an independent country. I am sure that the
statement recently made by Sir Milton Margai about the importance of capital
and the 438 fact that
his Government had no intention of embarking upon any nationalisation will be
of great benefit when finance is sought, as, indeed, Sierra Leone must seek it,
from overseas.
I must
correct the hon. Member for Eton and Slough (Mr. Brockway), who said that while
human rights were covered in the Bill of Rights, they had less priority in the
Constitution than property rights. The hon. Member is ill-informed. It is
really a question of reading the White Paper, and if the hon. Member looks at
paragraph 20 (a) he will find that fundamental rights are fully enshrined in
the procedure which my right hon. Friend described.
It is the
hon. Gentleman who has misunderstood me. What I quite clearly said was that the
protection of the rights of property is embodied in Clauses of the
Constitution. The Bill of Rights is an appendix to the Constitution. It is
enshrined in the Constitution by a particular reference in the body. My
complaint was that the Bill of Rights is an appendix while the justification of
property rights is in the Clauses of the Constitution itself.
Certainly,
fundamental human rights are entrenched, and that is the vital thing. Where
they come precisely in the Constitution is a different matter.
One of
our first considerations is, I believe, how we can be of further assistance to
Sierra Leone after independence so that we can make certain that the economic
future of the country is assured.
The other
wide area that we have discussed is the question of the Constitution itself and
the feeling both in this House and in Sierra Leone that it was essential that
proper human rights should be safeguarded. My hon. Friend went at some length
through the safeguards and the entrenchment clauses which will make certain
that there can be no alterations to these fundamental rights, to the
fundamental rights of Parliament and to the fundamental rights of the judiciary
without, first, a two-thirds majority passing it in the Sierra Leone House,
then a General Election, and following that, again a two-thirds majority. If
one considers this process one finds that the entrenchment of these rights is
satisfactory.
439 The cases of certain members of
the Opposition, and, in particular, the case of Mr. Siaka Stevens have been
raised. I am unable to comment on these individual cases, as they are, and must
be, sub judice, but I should like to point out to those who have raised these
matters that even the Government of a country which is on the verge of
achieving independence must ensure that the due course and process of the law
runs. If there are to be charges of criminal libel and other things, these
cases must be permitted to proceed. This is what the Government of Sierra Leone
have done. Various things have been said on both sides of the House regarding
these matters, and I hope that many of the things which have been said this
afternoon will receive a ready ear in the territory.
As we
look forward to 27th April, I think that it will be a proud day for Sierra
Leone. It will also, I believe, be a proud day for this country. Politically,
all parties in this House will see the achievement as a main objective of our
colonial policy, that of granting independence to our dependent territories. I
believe that all those who have visited Sierra Leone will agree that no people
among the emergent peoples are more deserving of this grant than the people of
that territory.
If our
political sense should be stirred by this event, so, too, should, I think, be
our historical imagination. As one looks back on the course of history over 440 the last
190 years, one recognises that in Sierra Leone, on 27th April, there will be
the culmination of an expression of freedom worked for by many in this realm
far beyond the confines of this House of Parliament. Freetown was truly named.
It is not too fanciful to say that its freedom traces back to the famous
judgment of Lord Mansfield; indeed, James Somerset was among its first
citizens. It was not merely in the High Court of Parliament or in the courts of
justice here that these aims were pursued. There have been many people from
this country—soldiers, administrators, missionaries and traders—who have given
their lives for Sierra Leone. Let us, on this occasion, pay tribute to them.
I think
that we, as a people, can be satisfied in truth and in honour; but, of course,
the great pride is for the people of Sierra Leone themselves. This is a small
country compared with the other great States of Africa. Before them lies a new
span of history, but I feel sure that in their sense of national destiny and
purpose, with the support of ourselves and, indeed, of the whole Commonwealth,
they will surmount the problems lying ahead of them.
§Question put and agreed to.
§Bill accordingly read a Second time.
§ Bill committed to a Committee of the whole
House.—[Mr. J. E. B. Hill.]
§Bill immediately considered in Committee; reported,
without Amendment; read the Third time and passed.
Comments