POLITICAL CRAZZYNESS: THE REGENT DISASTER: MUD/LANDSLIDE

POLITICAL CRAZZYNESS: THE REGENT DISASTER: MUD/LANDSLIDE

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE STATE OF SIERRA LEONE Vs LANSANA DUMBUYA Esq. SECRETARY GENERAY ALL PEOPLES CONGRESS.

Image
THE STATE OF SIERRA LEONE Vs LANSANA DUMBUYA Esq. SECRETARY GENERAY ALL PEOPLES CONGRESS. By: Israel Ojekeh Parper Snr.                     Lansana Dumbuya Esq. On Thursday 12th February 2026, The  Secretary General of the All Peoples Congress (APC), Barrister and Solicitor of the Sierra Leone Courts Lansana Dumbuya Esq., was charged by the Sierra Leone Police, with three counts of Incitement, insulting conduct, and public insult against the President (Julius Maada Bio). He was remanded in Prison after being refused Bail when he appeared at Magistrates court on 12 February 2026; the charges came about from Dumbuya’s political remarks and chants at the All-Peoples Congress Party Mammoth meeting at the Attouga Mini Stadium, Eastern Freetown on 31 st January 2026. Let us examine under what Laws or statutes these charges arose? The legal foundation for each of the three charges brought against Lansana Dumbuya, are b...
Read more

Zainab Sheriff’s First Appeal: Assessing the Prospects for a Positive Outcome

Image
  Zainab Sheriff’s First Appeal: Assessing the Prospects for a Positive Outcome. {By way of legal commentary based on public reporting and the arguments disclosed so far.   (The High Court of Sierra Leone- Freetown.) The appeal of Ms Zainab Sheriff has become one of the most closely watched criminal cases in Sierra Leone in recent years. What began as a prosecution for incitement and threatening language has now evolved into a broader test of criminal procedure, fair trial rights, freedom of expression, and the limits of Magistrates' Court jurisdiction. The High Court, presided over by Justice Mark Ngegba, has already rejected the State's preliminary attempt to strike out the appeal and has ruled that the grounds advanced by the defence raise matters deserving full judicial consideration. That ruling alone elevated the appeal from a routine challenge to a case of genuine legal significance.  However, before reaching any firm conclusions, it is important to rememb...
Read more

THE STATE Vs ZAINAB SHERIFF THE APPEAL

Image
  THE STATE (Respondent) Vs ZAINAB SHERIFF (Appellant) -                                           THE APPEAL CONVICTED ON CHARGES: INCITEMENT CONTRARY TO LAW, COUNT ONE – four years; USING THREATENING LANGUAGE, COUNT TWO – two months: UNDER PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1965  The case of Zainab Sheriff has evolved into more than a routine public‑order prosecution. It now sits at the crossroads of constitutional rights, procedural fairness, and the boundaries of political expression in Sierra Leone. As these matters progress into the appeal stage at the High Court, it raises important questions about consistency in judicial reasoning, proportionality in pre‑trial detention, and the delicate balance between public‑order enforcement and fundamental freedoms. These are not only political debates - they are legal issues that go to the heart of public confidence in the 250 years of the ...
Read more